TIFF22 Review: ‘The Whale’ Makes its Fat Protagonist a Spectacle, So What Else is New?

The Whale

Darren Aronofsky (director), Samuel D. Hunter (writer), Matthew Libatique (cinematography), Andrew Weisblum (editor)
Brendan Fraser, Sadie Sink, Hong Chau, Ty Simpkins, Samantha Morton (cast)

Content warning: Fatphobia, fat-shaming, food, religious rhethoric

Image credit: Courtesy of TIFF

There was a lot of buzz around The Whale, which is the only reason I went to watch it at the 2022 Toronto International Film Festival. This is not my kind of film and I hate how Hollywood still hasn’t stopped using fat suits. I mean, the film is about a fat person and it’s called The Whale, which is a pejorative used against plus-size people even now. I’m not sure any plus-size people were consulted in the making of this film (or the original play it was based on either). Despite all these red flags, I had hoped, given all the praise languished on the film, that I was in for a surprise. I wasn’t.

The film is about Charlie (Brendan Fraser), who is a 600-pound man who refuses to ‘take care of himself.’ He lives a reclusive life, interacting solely with his students on video chats, without his video on, and his friend, nurse Liz (Hong Chau). The film follows Charlie making amends with his loved ones during a pivotal moment in his life. He tries to patch up his relationship with his daughter Ellie (Sadie Sink), and while that’s certainly a significant part of the film, so is the journey of learning Charlie’s recent history and the status of his relationships with those closest to him. 

Samuel D. Hunter adapts his own play to create the film. As a character study, yes, The Whale is outstanding. It takes its time to unpeel the layers, gently introducing the audience to the characters and who they are. But the film still revels in being mean-spirited toward the only fat person in the story. Every affecting story beat is undone by fat-shaming or offensive stereotypes. Charlie is a sympathetic character who is dealing with trauma and grief and yet he hasn’t had the help he needs to move forward. But I’m not convinced the creators of the film believe that. There are far too many moments that are cruel and insulting for no apparent reason.

Though couched in sanctimonious language around Charlie’s ‘health’, which is nothing new to fat people, The Whale's real focus is on appearance and the perceived grotesqueness of Charlie’s body. The film keeps reiterating that Charlie has ‘let himself go’ and that his former partner would be ‘ashamed’ of what he is now. But The Whale misses a crucial understanding of not just fat people but also human relationships by harping on this point. Would Charlie’s late partner be upset because of how Charlie looks now or the fact that Charlie has stopped living life? It’s such a reductionist viewpoint and one that’s been done to death.

Despite some effort put in to humanize the character, Charlie is still presented as a creature to be gawked at, to be pitied, to be disgusted by. He is a man with an unhealthy relationship with food, which is how Hollywood and the majority of thin people imagine all fat people behave. It isn’t. Some people have different metabolisms, genetics, hereditary traits, medical conditions, and also a poor relationship to diet culture. These can all contribute to weight differences. But no, let’s leave nuance at the door and create a singular story about gluttony. 

Brendan Fraser in a fat suit annoys me. Him being an actor who is slightly larger than the average Hollywood actor does not give this movie brownie points. But he does act his heart out and imbues Charlie with so much personality and character. You will feel Charlie’s pain, his love, and his acceptance. 

Liz is played with aplomb by Hong Chau. She is very emotive and expressive and brings the film to life every time she’s on screen. Her character is much more sympathetic towards Charlie than everyone else, but she also has a few ‘I-told-you-so’ moments, which was frustrating. You don’t need to remind fat people that they’re fat—they already know!

I thought the Ty Simpkins character was superfluous. He was little more than an audience stand-in but also just a plot device. We needed less of him and more of Charlie bonding with Liz and maybe even his ex-wife. I understand that religious indoctrination is a significant part of America, but that plotline felt preachy and detracted from the rest of the story.

The biggest issue with the film was Ellie. Sadie Sink does a reasonable job with the script she’s given, but Ellie is a horrible character. At one point she’s referred to as ‘evil’, and I agree. She’s a nasty, cruel, unthinking person. She endlessly mocks and berates her father, and while it’s understandable that she’s angry with him, she takes it out by fat-shaming, name-calling, and belittling him. It was unbearable whenever her character was on screen, and worse when she was interacting with her father. In Ellie’s first scene with Charlie, she asks him to do something that, in real life, would have ended in severe injury or even death. It was a disgustingly ableist trope that’s been used in Hollywood before. Later on, she commits another act that, again, probably would have ended badly. But Ellie is given a redemptive arc, while Charlie remains an anomaly.

It’s obvious that Charlie’s weight is the reason for his isolation, but the film never engages with the idea that there are large people living their lives to the fullest. Charlie is surrounded by people of exactly one size, but none of them encourage him to return to living by showing him what other people in the fat community are doing. He’s beaten down by people who look down on him; can we blame him for the decision he finally makes?

The film is based on a play and comes across as such. The setting is almost exclusively in Charlie’s apartment, with a couple of exterior shots. But the setting is to the benefit of the story—this is Charlie’s home and we see how he has been able to modify it and how he navigates it. I did like that the set design makes it obvious what Charlie is passionate about, but then they threw in drawers full of candy, so I’m not as impressed anymore.

I genuinely expected this film to subvert Hollywood’s tradition of treating fat people like circus acts, but instead, it doubles down on that idea. The suggestion that this film is some kind of commentary or reflection on fat-shaming culture never sees the light of day. I wish I hadn’t watched this film, because it brings nothing new to pop culture’s dynamic with sizeism.

Comments